Athlon II X2 240e and Athlon II X3 435 CPU Review
Photoshop CS4
Contents
The best way to measure performance is by using real programs. The problem, though, is creating a methodology using real software that provides accurate results. For Photoshop CS4, there is a methodology created by the folks at GamingHeaven that is very accurate. Their script applies a series of 15 filters to a sample image, and we wrote down the time taken for each filter to run. At the end, we have the results for each individual filter and we simply added them up to have the total time taken to run the 15 filters from the GamingHeaven batch. The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the number the better.
On Photoshop CS4, on the other hand, is Intel’s land. Here Celeron E3200 was 10.16% faster than Athlon II X2 240e and Pentium E5200 was 6.56% faster than Athlon II X3 435.
When we installed a GeForce 9600 GT performance increased less than 3% compared to the results taken with the on-board video, so we have to consider that there was no significant performance increase when we installed a “real” video.