Crucial BX100 250 GiB SSD Review
Incompressible Data Test
Contents
For this test, we set CrystalDiskMark to the default mode, which uses incompressible data.
On the sequential read test, the BX100 was 5.1% slower than the Neutron XT.
On the sequential write test, the BX100 was 27% slower than the Neutron XT.
On the random read test with 512 kiB blocks the Crucial BX100 was 19% slower than the Neutron XT.
On the random write test with 512 kiB blocks, the BX100 was 26% slower than the Corsair Neutron XT.
On the random read test with 4 kiB blocks, the Crucial model was 26% slower than the Corsair Neutron XT.
And on the random write test with 4 kiB blocks, the BX100 was 29% slower than the Neutron XT.
But on the random read test with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the Crucial BX100 had the same performance of the Corsair Neutron XT.
Also on the random write test with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, both the tested SSDs had similar performance.