Foxconn WinFast 6100K8MA-RS Motherboard Review
3D Performance: Quake III
Contents
We used the demo four available on version 1.32 of Quake III to make our benchmarking with this game. We ran this demo three times at 1024x768x32 resolution and all image quality settings on their default conFiguretion and we picked the middle value for our comparisons, i.e., we discarded the highest and the lowest values.
You can check the results of our benchmarking below. All the listed video cards were installed on WinFast WinFast 6100K8MA-RS from Foxconn.
| Quake III – demo four | Score | Difference |
| Foxconn WinFast NF4UK8AA-8EKRS (nForce4 Ultra) + GeForce 6600 GT | 331.8 | +208.08% |
| GeForce 6600 GT (128 MB, 128 bits) | 316 | +193.41% |
| GeForce 6200 (128 MB, 128 bits) | 271.1 | +151.72% |
| Foxconn WinFast 6100K8MA-RS (GeForce 6100 + nForce 410) on-board | 107.7 | |
| ECS RS482-M (ATI Xpress 200 – RS482 + SB400) on-board | 100 | -7.70% |
| GeForce 6200 TurboCache (64 MB, 64 bits) | 64.1 | -68.02% |
On this test on-board video from Radeon Xpress 200 (RS482) was 7.70% faster than the on-board video from the reviewed motherboard (GeForce 6100).
Geforce 6100 from WinFast 6100K8MA-RS was, as expected, beaten by GeForce 6600 GT and GeForce 6200 but, like what happened previously, it was 68.02% faster than GeForce 6200 TurboCache (64 MB, 64-bit) from XFX.
When we installed a GeForce 6600 GT, WinFast 6100K8MA-RS was 4.76% slower than Foxconn WinFast NF4UK8AA-8EKRS, which is, as we mentioned earlier, a mainstream motherboard based on nForce 4 Ultra chipset.
