GeForce GTX 260 with 216 cores Video Card Review

Crysis

Crysis is a very heavy DirectX 10 game. We updated this game to version 1.2.1 and used the HOC Crysis Benchmarking Utility to help us collecting data. Since we don’t think the default demo based on the island map stresses the video card the way we want, we used the HOC core demo available with the abovementioned utility. We ran this demo under three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, and 2560×1600, first with image quality set to “low” and then with image quality set to “high.” Since all video cards achieved a number of frames per second below 10 at 2560×1600 with image details set to “high,” we are not including this test as the results aren’t reliable. We ran each test twice and discarded the first result, as usually the first run achieves a lower score compared to the subsequent runs since the game loses time loading files. The results below are the average number of frames per second (FPS) achieved by each card.

GeForce GTX 260 with 216 cores
Crysis 1.2.1 – 1680×1050 – Low Score Difference
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 125 16.82%
GeForce GTX 280 125 16.82%
Radeon HD 4870 X2 120 12.15%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 115 7.48%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 107  
Radeon HD 4870 101 5.94%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 99 8.08%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 91 17.58%
GeForce 9800 GTX 84 27.38%
Radeon HD 4850 84 27.38%
GeForce 9800 GX2 75 42.67%
GeForce 9800 GT 75 42.67%
Radeon HD 4830 74 44.59%
Radeon HD 3870 71 50.70%
GeForce GTX 260 with 216 cores
Crysis 1.2.1 – 1920×1200 – Low Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 119 30.77%
GeForce GTX 280 115 26.37%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 115 26.37%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 108 18.68%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 91  
Radeon HD 4870 84 8.33%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 83 9.64%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 76 19.74%
GeForce 9800 GTX 69 31.88%
Radeon HD 4850 67 35.82%
GeForce 9800 GX2 63 44.44%
GeForce 9800 GT 61 49.18%
Radeon HD 4830 61 49.18%
Radeon HD 3870 58 56.90%
GeForce GTX 260 with 216 cores
Crysis 1.2.1 – 2560×1600 – Low Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 103 71.67%
GeForce GTX 280 95 58.33%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 86 43.33%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 71 18.33%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 60  
Radeon HD 4870 53 13.21%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 52 15.38%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 49 22.45%
GeForce 9800 GTX 44 36.36%
Radeon HD 4850 43 39.53%
GeForce 9800 GX2 42 42.86%
GeForce 9800 GT 39 53.85%
Radeon HD 4830 38 57.89%
Radeon HD 3870 35 71.43%
GeForce GTX 260 with 216 cores
Crysis 1.2.1 – 1680×1050 – High Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 57 54.05%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 47 27.03%
GeForce GTX 280 42 13.51%
Radeon HD 4870 37 0.00%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 37  
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 32 15.63%
GeForce 9800 GTX 29 27.59%
Radeon HD 4850 29 27.59%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 29 27.59%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 26 42.31%
GeForce 9800 GX2 25 48.00%
GeForce 9800 GT 25 48.00%
Radeon HD 4830 25 48.00%
Radeon HD 3870 19 94.74%
GeForce GTX 260 with 216 cores
Crysis 1.2.1 – 1920×1200 – High Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 47 56.67%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 39 30.00%
GeForce GTX 280 34 13.33%
Radeon HD 4870 30 0.00%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 30  
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 26 15.38%
Radeon HD 4850 23 30.43%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 23 30.43%
GeForce 9800 GTX 22 36.36%
GeForce 9800 GX2 21 42.86%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 20 50.00%
GeForce 9800 GT 20 50.00%
Radeon HD 4830 20 50.00%
Radeon HD 3870 16 87.50%

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *