Incompressible Data Test
Contents
On this test, we left CrystalDiskMark at standard mode, with random, non-compressible data.
On the sequential read test with a queue depth of 32, the Intel SSD750 at a PCI Express 3.0 was 114% faster than the Kingston HyperX Predator. While connected to a PCI Express 2.0 slot, its performance droped by 55%.
On the sequential write test with a queue depth of 32, the SSD 750 Series was 25% faster than the Predator. Connected to a PCI Express 2.0 slot, it maintained the same performance.
On the random reading test with 4 kiB blocks and QD 32, the 750 Series was 140% faster than the HyperX Predator 480 GiB. Connected to a PCI Express 2.0 slot, the performance dropped by 40%.
On the random writing test with 4 kiB blocks and QD 32, the Intel SSD was 131% faster than the Kingston model. While connected to a PCI Express 2.0 slot, its performance dropped by 34%.
On the simple sequential read test (i.e., queue depth of one), the SSD 750 was 84% faster than the Predator. Connected to a PCI Express 2.0 slot, its performance was 9% lower.
On the simple sequential writing test (i.e., queue depth of one), the SSD 750 beat the Predator by 26%. Connected to a PCI Express 2.0 slot, its performance dropped by 5%.
On the simple random reading test, the SDD 750 was 11% faster than the HyperX Predator. Connected to a PCI Express 2.0 slot, its performance was 10% lower.
On the random write test with 4 kiB blocks, the SSD 750 Series was 258% faster than the HyperX Predator. Its performance dropped 33% when connected to a PCI Express 2.0 slot.