Kingston SSDNow UV400 120 GiB SSD Review
Incompressible Data Test
Contents
For this test, we set CrystalDiskMark to the default mode, which uses incompressible data.
On the sequential read benchmark, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 120 GiB was 14% faster than the V300, and obtained similar performance to the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the sequential write benchmark, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 120 GiB was 219% faster than the V300 and 76% faster than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the random read test with 512 kiB blocks, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 120 GiB was on a technical tie with the V300, but was 21% faster than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the random write benchmark with 512 kiB blocks, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 120 GiB was 114% faster than the V300, but 5% slower than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 120 GiB was 8% slower than the V300, but 57% faster than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
And on the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, all the models performed similarly.
On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 120 GiB was 251% faster than the V300 and 103% faster than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 120 GiB was 164% faster than the V300, but 17% slower than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.