Kingston SSDNow UV400 240 GiB SSD Review
Incompressible Data Test
Contents
For this test, we set CrystalDiskMark to the default mode, which uses incompressible data.
On the sequential read benchmark, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 240 GiB obtained similar performance to the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the sequential write benchmark, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 240 GiB was 25% faster than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the random read test with 512 kiB blocks, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 240 GiB was 17% faster than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the random write benchmark with 512 kiB blocks, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 240 GiB performed similarly to the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 240 GiB was 10% faster than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
And on the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 240 GiB was 48% slower than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 240 GiB was 54% faster than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.
On the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the Kingston SSDNow UV400 240 GiB was 9% faster than the SanDisk SSD PLUS.