SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GiB Review

Incompressible Data Test

For this test, we set CrystalDiskMark to the default mode, which uses incompressible data.

On the sequential read test, all the three models had similar performances.

SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GiB

On the sequential write test, the SSD PLUS was on tie with the BX100, but was 26% slower than the Neutron XT.

SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GiB

On the read test with 512 kiB blocks, SanDisk drive was 15% slower than the Crucial BX100, and 28% slower than the Neutron XT.

SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GiB
SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GiB


On the write test with 512 kiB blocks, the SanDisk SSD PLUS was 5% slower than the BX100, and 27% slower than the Corsair Neutron XT.

On the random read test with 4 kiB blocks, the SSD PLUS was 29% slower than the Crucial model, and 41% slower than the Corsair Neutron XT.

SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GiB
SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GiB


On the random write test with 4 kiB blocks, the SSD PLUS was 6% faster than the BX100, obtaining similar performance to the Neutron XT.

On the random read test with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the SSD PLUS was 36% slower than the Crucial BX100, and 55% slower than the Neutron XT.

SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GiB


On the random write test with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the SanDisk drive had a similar performance to the BX100, but was 23% slower than the Corsair Neutron XT.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *