Sempron 3000+ and Celeron D 331 Review
PCMark05 Professional
Contents
PCMark05 Professional measures the system performance by running several tests. We selected two batches for our comparisons, System and CPU.
The System batch performs the following tests: HDD XP Startup, Physics and 3D, 2D Transparent Window, 3D Pixel Shader, Web Page Rendering, File Decryption, 2D Graphics Memory – 64 lines, HDD General Usage and three multithreading tests.
The CPU batch performs the following tests: File Compression, File Decompression, File Encryption, File Decryption, Image Decompression, Audio Compression and two multithreading tests.
The results are given in a PCMark05 specific unit.
| Sempron 3000+(1.8 GHz) | Celeron D 331(2.66 GHz) | Difference | |
| PCMark05 – System | 2718 | 2632 | 3.27% |
| PCMark05 – CPU | 2537 | 2993 | 17.97% |
On system batch, the Sempron 3000+ (1.8 GHz) was 3.27% faster than the Celeron D 331 (2.66 GHz), that is, they both achieved almost the same performance.
On CPU batch, Celeron D 331 (2.66 GHz) was 17.97% faster than the AMD processor.