WD Blue 1,000 GiB SSD Review

Incompressible Data Test

For this test, we set CrystalDiskMark to the default mode, which uses incompressible data.

On the sequential read benchmark, the WD Blue performed similarly to the Savage.

On the sequential write benchmark, the WD Blue the WD Blue was 5% slower than the HyperX Savage.

On the random read test with 512 kiB blocks, the WD Blue was 4% faster than the HyperX Savage.

On the random write benchmark with 512 kiB blocks, the WD Blue was 4% slower than the HyperX Savage.

On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the WD Blue was 14% faster than the HyperX Savage.

And on the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the WD Blue was 12% faster than the HyperX Savage.

On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the WD Blue was 11% faster than the HyperX Savage.

On the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the WD Blue was 22% slower than the HyperX Savage.