3DMark03 simulates DirectX 8 and 9 games. Even though this program may be considered “old”, we ran it to see how the tested video cards perform on older games. Since we are comparing high-end cards, we ran this program in higher resolutions, as performance difference between high-end video cards is more expressive on such resolutions. We chose three resolutions, 1600×1200, 1920×1440 and 2048×1536. At each resolution we simulated two scenarios, first with no image quality enhancements enabled (this scenario we called “low”) and then with anti-aliasing set at 4x and anisotropic filtering set at 16x (this scenario we called “high”). The results you check below. All video cards listed below were running with the default clock rates defined by the chip manufacturer.
3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 -1600×1200
Score
Difference
Radeon HD 2900 XT (AMD)
23150
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX)
22565
2.59%
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI)
15392
50.40%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis)
14387
60.91%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX)
12020
92.60%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX)
11744
97.12%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor)
11243
105.91%
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA)
10278
125.24%
3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 -1920×1440
Score
Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX)
18351
3.75%
Radeon HD 2900 XT (AMD)
17687
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI)
12081
46.40%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis)
11287
56.70%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX)
9437
87.42%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX)
9245
91.31%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor)
8731
102.58%
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA)
8018
120.59%
3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 2048×1536
Score
Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX)
16953
4.47%
Radeon HD 2900 XT (AMD)
16228
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI)
11327
43.27%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis)
10348
56.82%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX)
8386
93.51%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor)
7656
111.96%
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA)
7272
123.16%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX)
7066
129.66%
3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 1600×1200 AAx4, AFx16
Score
Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX)
13181
29.25%
Radeon HD 2900 XT (AMD)
10198
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI)
8637
18.07%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis)
7903
29.04%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX)
6634
53.72%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX)
6422
58.80%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor)
6236
63.53%
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA)
5553
83.65%
3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 1920×1440 AAx4, AFx16
Score
Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX)
10231
30.95%
Radeon HD 2900 XT (AMD)
7813
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI)
6535
19.56%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis)
6037
29.42%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor)
4765
63.97%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX)
4637
68.49%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX)
4467
74.90%
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA)
3850
102.94%
3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 2048×1536 AAx4, AFx16
On games, using a mainstream video card, which is the faster CPU, a high-end one from six years ago, or a low-end recent processor? Let’s find out! This is Part 2 in our Myth-busting series.
Our review of the overclocked Radeon X1300 XT from HIS, a.k.a. Radeon X1300 XT IceQ Turbo, which comes with a good cooling solution from Arctic Cooling.
The Aerocool Dead Silence is a “cube-style” computer case aimed on silence, supporting microATX and Mini-ITX motherboards, where the motherboard is installed horizontally. Let’s analyze it.