Celeron G3900 CPU Review

Photoshop CC and Cinebench R15

Contents

Cinebench R15

Cinebench R15 is based on the Cinema 4D software. It is very useful to measure the performance gain obtained by the presence of several processing cores while rendering heavy 3D images. Rendering is an area where a bigger number of cores helps a lot, because usually this kind of software recognize several processors (Cinebench R15, for example, can use up to 256 processing cores).
We ran the CPU benchmark, which renders a complex image using all the processing cores (real and virtual) to speed up the process. The result is given as a score.
Celeron G3900 review
Here the Celeron G3900 was 17% slower than the Pentium G4400, and 54% faster than the A6-7400B.

DivX

We used the DivX converter, a tool included in the DivX package, in order to measure the encoding performance using this codec. The DivX codec is capable of recognizing and using all available cores and the SSE4 instruction set.
We converted a Full HD, six-minute long .mov video file into a .avi file, using the “HD 1080p” output profile. The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better.
Celeron G3900 review
On DivX encoding, the Celeron G3900 was 24% slower than the Pentium G4400, and 19% faster than the A6-7400B.

DVDShrink

DVDShrink is an old but still very useful program to “shrink” video DVDs that have more than 4.7 GiB of data to fit single-layer DVD media. We used it to compress the DVD of “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring” DVD to 4.7 GiB. The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better.
Celeron G3900 review
On this test, the Celeron G3900 was 43% slower than the Pentium G4400, and 17% slower than the A6-7400B.

Media Espresso

Media Espresso is a video conversion program that uses the graphics processing unit of the video engine to speed up the conversion process. We converted a 1 GiB, 1920x1080i, 23,738 kbps, .mov video file to a smaller 320×200, H.264, .MP4 file for viewing on a smartphone. The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better.

Celeron G3900 review

Here the Celeron G3900 was 15% slower than the Pentium G4400, and 17% faster than the A6-7400B.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *