Core 2 Extreme QX6850 Review
F.E.A.R.
Contents
F.E.A.R. is a heavy game and we used its internal benchmarking module. We upgraded it to version 1.08 and measured performance in two scenarios, both at 1600×1200 with “computer settings” at “maximum”. The first one, we called “low”, was with “graphics card” set at “low”, and the second one, we called “high”, was with “graphics card” set at “maximum”. Let’s take a look at the results, given in frames per second.
| F.E.A.R. 1.08 – Low | FPS | Difference |
| Core 2 Extreme X6800 (2.93 GHz) | 273 | 1.49% |
| Core 2 Extreme “QX6950” (3.33 GHz) | 271 | 0.74% |
| Core 2 Duo E6700 (2.66 GHz) | 269 | 0.00% |
| Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (3 GHz) | 269 | |
| Core 2 Duo E6750 (2.66 GHz) | 267 | 0.75% |
| Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (2.66 GHz) | 266 | 1.13% |
| Pentium 4 550 (3.4 GHz) | 195 | 37.95% |
On F.E.A.R. with image quality set to “low” all Core 2 CPUs achieved the same performance level, indicating that the video card is the component limiting the maximum performance you can achieve.
| F.E.A.R. 1.08 – High | FPS | Difference |
| Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (2.66 GHz) | 52 | 0.00% |
| Core 2 Duo E6700 (2.66 GHz) | 52 | 0.00% |
| Core 2 Duo E6750 (2.66 GHz) | 52 | 0.00% |
| Core 2 Extreme “QX6950” (3.33 GHz) | 52 | 0.00% |
| Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (3 GHz) | 52 | |
| Pentium 4 550 (3.4 GHz) | 51 | 1.96% |
| Core 2 Extreme X6800 (2.93 GHz) | 50 | 4.00% |
When we changed the image quality settings to “maximum” all CPUs achieved the same performance level, indicating that the video card is the one limiting the maximum performance you can achieve.