We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
[nextpage title=”Introduction”]
Back in 2011, we tested mayonnaise as a thermal interface between the CPU and the base of the cooler. Amazingly, it worked nicely, proving to be, at least in a short term, a better thermal compound than several well-known commercial products. But, at the time, we could not determine how long it would continue to work before a degradation in performance was noted. This time around, we ran a long-term test to determine if mayonnaise can last as a thermal compound.
We applied Hellman’s (known as “Best Foods” in the West Coast of the United States) “real mayonnaise” on our CPU, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Mayonnaise applied as thermal compound
Then, we kept our system running for 12 days, 24 hours per day, and collected data every day. Let’s see the results in the next pages.
[nextpage title=”How We Tested”]
We tested mayonnaise as a thermal compound on a Core i5-2500K CPU (quad-core, 3.3 GHz), which is a socket LGA1155 processor with a 95 W TDP (Thermal Design Power). In order to get higher thermal dissipation, we overclocked it to 4.0 GHz (100 MHz base clock and x40 multiplier), with 1.3 V core voltage (Vcore). The cooler used was the Cooler Master Seidon 120XL, which we reviewed recently.
We measured the core temperature with the CPU under full load. In order to get 100% CPU usage in all cores, we ran Prime 95 25.11 with the “In-place Large FFTs” option. (In this version, the software uses all available threads.)
Room temperature measurements were taken with a digital thermometer. The core temperature was read with the SpeedFan program (available from the CPU thermal sensors), using an arithmetic average of the core temperature readings. During the tests, the panels of the computer case were closed.
We calculated the Delta-T (difference between the core temperature and room temperature) immediately after starting the test, at four hours, and at eight hours, and after that, we repeated the test once per day for 12 days.
Between the tests, the system was working continuously, running the [email protected] SMP client, in order to keep the CPU warm and stressed.
Hardware Configuration
- Processor: Core i5-2500K
- Motherboard: ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z
- CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Seidon 120XL
- Memory: 16 GB G.Skill Sniper (DDR3-1600/PC3-12800), configured at 1,600 MHz
- Hard disk: Mushkin Chronos 120 GB
- Video card: MSI GeForce GT 210 1 GB
- Video resolution: 1920×1080
- Video monitor: Samsung SyncMaster P2470HN
- Power supply: Seventeam ST-550P-AM
- Case: Cooler Master HAF 922
Operating System Configuration
- Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit SP1
Software Used
Error Margin
We adopted a 2°C error margin, meaning temperature differences below 2°C were considered irrelevant.
[nextpage title=”Our Tests”]
We tested the temperature once a day for 12 days. The results of those measurements are shown in the table below.
| Time | Room Temp. | Core Temp. | Temp. Diff. |
| 0 h | 12 °C | 53 °C | 41 °C |
| 4 h | 16 °C | 57 °C | 41 °C |
| 8 h | 15 °C | 56 °C | 41 °C |
| 24 h | 12 °C | 52 °C | 40 °C |
| 2 d | 13 °C | 56 °C | 43 °C |
| 3 d | 15 °C | 61 °C | 46 °C |
| 4 d | 14 °C | 60 °C | 46 °C |
| 5 d | 15 °C | 62 °C | 47 °C |
| 6 d | 14 °C | 61 °C | 47 °C |
| 7 d | 14 °C | 61 °C | 47 °C |
| 8 d | 13 °C | 61 °C | 48 °C |
| 9 d | 12 °C | 60 °C | 48 °C |
| 10 d | 14 °C | 61 °C | 47 °C |
| 12 d | 12 °C | 59 °C | 47 °C |
In the following graph, you can see the evolution of the temperature differences over time.
The collected data is very self-consistent, because even with variations in the room temperature, the temperature difference didn’t vary in an unexpected way. When the temperature was reduced, the variation was below the error margin.
The thermal performance was constant in the first two days of the test. At the third day, the performance began to degrade, stabilizing after the fourth day.
Figures 2 and 3 show the CPU and the base of the cooler after the 12-day test. It looks like the copper at the base of the cooler was somewhat oxidized. We managed to clean both surfaces, but it took a soaped sponge to do that.
Figure 2: CPU after running on mayonnaise for 12 days
Figure 3: Base of the cooler after running on mayonnaise for 12 days
[nextpage title=”Conclusions”]
Let’s try to answer the question we initially posed. The answer could be “not very well.” The initial performance of the mayonnaise nearly equals the performance of good “real” thermal compounds, and lasts for about 24 hours.
After that, the cooling performance degrades. But the temperature difference stabilizes at about six degrees Celsius hotter than the initial temperature, which is not a complete disaster, but obviously places mayonnaise below the performance of commercial thermal pastes.
So, does mayonnaise last as a good thermal compound? No, it doesn’t. But does it stop working as a thermal compound? Absolutely not. After a couple of days, it works as a pretty poor thermal compound, which is better than no thermal compound at all.
Also, after 12 days the metallic cap of the CPU and the base of the CPU cooler were pretty oxidized. Even though we could remove this oxidation with a sponge, we don’t know what would happen after a longer period of time.