ECS GeForce 9800 GTX+ Hydra Video Card Review

3DMark Vantage Professional

3DMark Vantage is the latest addition to the 3DMark series, measuring Shader 4.0 (i.e., DirectX 10) performance and supporting PhysX, a programming interface developed by Ageia (now part of NVIDIA) to transfer physics calculations from the system CPU to the video card GPU in order to increase performance. Mechanical physics is the basis for calculations about the interaction of objects. For example, if you shoot, what exactly will happen to the object when the bullet hits it? Will it break? Will it move? Will the bullet bounce back? Notice that we didn’t upgrade the PhysX to the latest version, which would make the physics calculations for CPU Test 2 to be made by the GPU instead of the CPU on NVIDIA video cards (since we aren’t considering CPU or 3DMark scores this change wouldn’t produce any increase in our results anyway).

We ran this program at three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, and 2560×1600. First we used the “Performance” profile, and then we used the “Extreme” profile (basically enabling anti-aliasing at 4x, anisotropic filtering at 16x, and putting all detail settings at their maximum or “extreme” value. The combination of 2560×1600 resolution with extreme settings didn’t produce reliable results according to the program, so we aren’t going to add them here. The results being compared are the “GPU Scores” achieved by each video card.

ECS Hydra GeForce 9800 GTX+
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Performance Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 11697 34.06%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ SLI 8725  
GeForce GTX 280 7695 13.39%
GeForce 9800 GX2 6990 24.82%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 6193 40.88%
GeForce GTX 260 5898 47.93%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 5651 54.40%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 4797 81.88%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 4499 93.93%
GeForce 9800 GTX 3805 129.30%
GeForce 9800 GT 3691 136.39%
Radeon HD 3870 2977 193.08%
ECS Hydra GeForce 9800 GTX+
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Performance Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 9472 44.72%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ SLI 6545  
GeForce GTX 280 6106 7.19%
GeForce 9800 GX2 5379 21.68%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 4880 34.12%
GeForce GTX 260 4582 42.84%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 4336 50.95%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 3725 75.70%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 3370 94.21%
GeForce 9800 GT 2951 121.79%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2891 126.39%
Radeon HD 3870 2269 188.45%
ECS Hydra GeForce 9800 GTX+
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 2560×1600 – Performance Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 5542 59.16%
GeForce GTX 280 3549 1.92%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ SLI 3482  
GeForce 9800 GX2 2910 19.66%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 2728 27.64%
GeForce GTX 260 2640 31.89%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2382 46.18%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 2050 69.85%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 1815 91.85%
GeForce 9800 GT 1638 112.58%
GeForce 9800 GTX 1557 123.64%
Radeon HD 3870 1244 179.90%
E
CS Hydra GeForce 9800 GTX+
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Extreme Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 8405 35.67%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ SLI 6195  
GeForce GTX 280 6005 3.16%
GeForce 9800 GX2 4858 27.52%
GeForce GTX 260 4531 36.72%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 4360 42.09%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 3567 73.68%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 3445 79.83%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 3201 93.53%
GeForce 9800 GT 2741 126.01%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2703 129.19%
Radeon HD 3870 1855 233.96%
ECS Hydra GeForce 9800 GTX+
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Extreme Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 6916 56.65%
GeForce GTX 280 4732 7.18%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ SLI 4415  
GeForce GTX 260 3576 23.46%
GeForce 9800 GX2 3508 25.86%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 3490 26.50%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 2753 60.37%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2669 65.42%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 2399 84.04%
GeForce 9800 GT 2136 106.69%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2038 116.63%
Radeon HD 3870 1439 206.81%

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *