We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

[nextpage title=”Introduction”]

The new GeForce GTX 660 Ti, which is being released today, is the latest GPU from NVIDIA, and EVGA is providing six different video card models based on this new GPU. Let’s see how the SuperClocked model fared on our tests.

In the table below, you can see the six models EVGA is releasing.

Model Memory Configuration MSRP
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2 GB USD 300
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked 2 GB USD 310
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti FTW 2 GB USD 330
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti+ 3 GB USD 330
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked+ 3 GB USD 340
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti FTW+ 3 GB USD 360

At USD 300, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti is targeted to the user who is looking for a relatively affordable high-end video card. Its main competitor is the Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition.

The new GeForce GTX 660 Ti uses the PCI Express 3.0 interface, similarly to its main competitor, while the GeForce 560 Ti and the GeForce GTX 570, which we also included in our comparisons, use the PCI Express 2.0 interface. This new GPU has an automatic overclocking feature that increases the core clock from 915 MHz to 980 MHz when more performance is needed (980 MHz to 1,059 MHz on the EVGA’s SuperClocked model).

In the table below, we compare the main specifications for the video cards included in our review. The prices listed below were researched at Newegg.com and do not include rebates. The price of the GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the one advertised by NVIDIA, while the price for the EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked is the one advertised by EVGA.

Video Card Core Clock Shader Clock Memory Clock (Effective) Memory Interface Memory Transfer Rate Memory Shaders DirectX Price
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 822 MHz 1,644 MHz 4,008 MHz 256-bit 128.3 GB/s 1 GB GDDR5 384 11 USD 210 – 230
GeForce GTX 570 732 MHz 1,464 MHz 3.8 GHz 320-bit 152 GB/s 1.28 GB GDDR5 480 11 USD 270 – 330
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 915 MHz NA 6,008 MHz 192-bit 144.2 GB/s 2 GB GDDR5 1,344 11 USD 300
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked 980 MHz NA 6,008 MHz 192-bit 144.2 GB/s 2 GB GDDR5 1,344 11 USD 310
AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 1 GHz NA 4.8 GHz 256-bit 153.6 GHz 2 GB GDDR5 1,280 11.1 USD 270 – 310

You can compare the specs of these video cards with other video cards by taking a look at our “AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table” and “NVIDIA Chips Comparison Table” tutorials.

Now let’s take a complete look at the EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked.

[nextpage title=”The EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked”]

Below we have an overall look at the EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked. It requires two six-pin auxiliary power connectors.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperclockedFigure 1: EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked video card

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperclockedFigure 2: EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked video card

The reviewed video card comes with two DVI-I connectors, one HDMI connector, and one DisplayPort connector.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperclockedFigure 3: Video connectors

The cooler uses a 60 mm radial fan placed beside an aluminum heatsink. The heatsink features a copper base. See Figures 4 and 5. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has a TDP of 150 W.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperclockedFigure 4: The heatsink

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperclockedFigure 5: The base of the heatsink

[nextpage title=”The EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked (Cont’d)”]

In Figure 6, you can see the video card with its cooler removed. We were impressed by how short the printed circuit board is, at 6.8” (172 mm). The video card, however, is a little longer, at 9.5” (240 mm), because of the fan.

It uses a voltage regulator with four phases for the GPU and two phases for the memory chips. The voltage regulator circuit uses a digital design and is controlled by an NCP5392P chip. All coils use ferrite cores and all capacitors are solid.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperclockedFigure 6: EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked video card

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperclockedFigure 7: Voltage regulator

The reviewed video card uses eight Hynix H5GQ2H24AFR-R0C GDDR5 chips, each one storing 2 Gbit of data, comprising the 2 GB of memory available on this video card. Six of these chips are located on the component side of the printed circuit board, each connected to the GPU through a 32-bit lane, creating the 192-bit datapath that is available. The other two chips are located on the solder side of the printed circuit board and apparently share the datapaths used by two of the chips that are available on the component side of the board. There are spaces for soldering four additional memory chips, so the 3 GB version of this video card most likely uses the same printed circuit board but has all of the spaces populated.

The chips that come soldered on this video card can run up to 6 GHz. On this video card, they are ac
cessed at 6,008 MHz.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperclockedFigure 8: Memory chips

In Figure 9, you can see the accessories that come with this video card.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperclockedFigure 9: Accessories

Before seeing the performance results, let’s recap the main features of this video card.

[nextpage title=”Main Specifications”]

The main specifications for the EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked include:

  • Graphics chip: GeForce GTX 660 Ti running at 980 MHz (up to 1,059 MHz in boost mode)
  • Memory: 2 GB GDDR5 memory (192-bit interface) running at 6,008MHz QDR (Hynix H5GQ2H24AFR-R0C chips)
  • Bus type: PCI Express 3.0 x16
  • Video Connectors: Two DVI-I, one HDMI, and one DisplayPort
  • Video Capture (VIVO): No
  • Cables and adapters that come with this board: One DVI-to-VGA adapter and two power adapters
  • Number of CDs/DVDs that come with this board: NA
  • Games included: NA
  • Programs included: NA
  • More information: https://www.evga.com
  • MSRP in the U.S.: USD 310.00

[nextpage title=”How We Tested”]

During our benchmarking sessions, we used the configuration listed below. Between our benchmarking sessions, the only variable was the video card being tested.

Hardware Configuration

Software Configuration

  • Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
  • Video resolution: 2560×1600 @ 60 Hz

Driver Versions

  • AMD video driver version: Catalyst 12.6
  • NVIDIA video driver version: 305.37
  • Intel Inf driver version: 9.2.3.1022

Software Used

Error Margin

We adopted a 3% error margin. Thus, differences below 3% cannot be considered relevant. In other words, products with a performance difference below 3% should be considered as having similar performance.

[nextpage title=”StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty”]

StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty is a very popular DirectX 9 game that was released in 2010. Though this game uses an old version of DirectX, the number of textures that can be represented on one screen can push most of the top-end graphics cards to their limits. StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty uses its own physics engine that is bound to the CPU and thus does not benefit from PhysX.

We tested this game at 1920×1200 and 2560×1600. The “Graphics Quality” was set to “Extreme” and the “Texture Quality” was set to “Ultra.” We then used FRAPS to collect the frame rate of a replay on the “Unit Testing” custom map. We used a battle between very large armies to stress the video cards.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty 1920×1200 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked 241.4 3%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

233.5

 
GeForce GTX 570

232.2

1%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

216.4

8%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

210.8

11%

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty 2560×1600 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

192.7

3%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

186.7

 
GeForce GTX 570

184.2

1%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

179.6

4%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

174.6

7%

[nextpage title=”Far Cry 2″]

Released in 2008, Far Cry 2 is based on a game engine called Dunia, which is DirectX 10. We used the benchmarking utility that comes with this game at 1920×1200 and 2560×1600, setting overall quality to “ultra high,” maximizing all image quality settings, adjusting anti-aliasing to “8x,” and running the “Ranch Long” demo three times. The results below are expressed in frames per second and are an arithmetic average of the three results collected.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

FarCry 2 1920×1200 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked 97.9 6%
GeForce GTX 570 97.2 5%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 92.2  
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 81.4 13%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 81.4 13%

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

FarCry 2 2560×1600 Difference
GeForce GTX 570 67.4 11%
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked 64.3 6%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 60.9  
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 57.3 6%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 54.3 12%

[nextpage title=”Aliens vs. Predator”]

Aliens vs. Predator is a DirectX 11 game that makes full use of tessellation and advanced shadow rendering. We used the Aliens vs. Predator Benchmark Tool developed by Rebellion. This program reads its configuration from a text file. (Our configuration files can be found here.) We ran this program at 1920×1200 and 2560×1600, with texture set at “very high,” shadows set at “medium,” anisotropic filtering set at “8x,” and anti-aliasing set at “2x.”

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

Aliens vs. Predator 1920×1200 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked 51.4 3%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 50.0  
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 49.7 1%
GeForce GTX 570 46.4 8%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 42.7 17%

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

Aliens vs. Predator  2560×1600 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

34.1

6%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 32.1  
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 32.0 0%
GeForce GTX 570 31.4 2%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

29.4

9%

[nextpage title=”DiRT3″]

DiRT3 is a DirectX 11 game. We measured performance using this game by running a race and then playing it back using FRAPS. We ran this game at 1920×1200 and 2560×1536 with image quality set to “ultra,” and with anti-aliasing set at “8xMSAA.”

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

DiRT3 1920×1200 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

74.8

3%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

72.4

 
GeForce GTX 570

66.4

9%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

61.2

18%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

59.5

22%

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

DiRT3 2560×1600 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked 61.4 5%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 58.6  
GeForce GTX 570 51.2 14%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 39.7 47%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 39.4 49%

[nextpage title=”Deus Ex: Human Revolution”]

Deus Ex: Human Revolution is another DirectX 11 game. We used the in-game introduction to measure the number of frames per second, using FRAPS. We ran the introduction in two resolutions, 1920×1200 and 2560×1536, maximizing all image quality settings, configuring anti-aliasing as “MLAA” and anisotropic filtering at “16x.”

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

Deus Ex: Human Revolution 1920×1200 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

193.7

3%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

187.6

 
GeForce GTX 570

182.7

3%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

158.7

18%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

156.7

20%

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

Deus Ex: Human Revolution 2560×1600 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked 136.4 4%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 130.6  
GeForce GTX 570 124.8 5%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 112.5 16%
GeForce GTX 5
60 Ti
110.6 18%

[nextpage title=”Battlefield 3″]Battlefield 3 is the latest installment in the Battlefield franchise released in 2011. It is based on the Frostbite 2 engine, which is DirectX 11. In order to measure performance using this game, we walked our way through the first half of the “Operation Swordbreaker” mission, measuring the number of frames per second using FRAPS. We ran this game at 1920×1200 and 2560×1536, maximizing all image quality settings, configuring anti-aliasing as “4xMSAA” and anisotropic filtering at “16x.”

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

Battlefield 3 1920×1200 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

68.1

2%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

66.7

 
GeForce GTX 570

61.6

8%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

55.6

20%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

54.2

23%

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

Battlefield 3 2560×1600 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked 45.6 5%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 43.4  
GeForce GTX 570 41.4 5%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 38.3 13%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 38.2 14%

[nextpage title=”3DMark 11 Professional”]

3DMark 11 Professional measures Shader 5.0 (i.e., DirectX 11) performance. We ran this program at 1920×1200 and 2560×1600, selecting the four graphics tests available and deselecting the other tests available. We used two image quality settings, “performance” and “extreme,” both at their default settings. The results being compared are the “GPU Score” achieved by each video card.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

3DMark 11 – Performance 1920×1200 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

4161

4%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

3994

 
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

3152

27%
GeForce GTX 570

3021

32%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2762

45%

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

3DMark 11 – Performance 2560×1600 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

2403

1%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2375

 
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

1817

31%
GeForce GTX 570

1809

31%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

1589

49%

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

3DMark 11 – Extreme 1920×1200 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

2473

7%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2308

 
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

1851

25%
GeForce GTX 570

1794

29%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

1564

48%

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

3DMark 11 – Extreme 2560×1600 Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

1492

5%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

1427

 
GeForce GTX 570

1324

8%
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

1153

24%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

1126

27%

[nextpage title=”Media Espresso 6.5″]

Media Espresso is a video conversion program that uses the graphics processing unit of the video card to speed up the conversion process. We converted a 449 MB, 1920x1080i, 18,884 kbps, MPEG2 video file to a smaller 640×360, H.264, .MPG4 file for viewing on a portable device such as an iPhone or iPod Touch.

EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Superclocked

Media Espresso 6.5 Seconds Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked

31

3%
GeForce GTX 570

32

0%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

32

 
Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

34

6%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

36

13%

[nextpage title=”Conclusions”]

In most games, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti was between 12% and 20% faster than its main competitor, the Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition. There were some games in which both achieved the same performance, and on one, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti was 47% faster. There was no scenario where the GeForce GTX 660 Ti was slower than its competitor.

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti was between 7% and 49% faster than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti, and up to 32% faster than the GeForce GTX 570 (except on FarCry 2 at 2560×1600, where the GeForce GTX 570 was 11% faster than the GeForce GTX 660 Ti), which is found at the same price range.

Therefore, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti is, today, the best option if you have USD 300 to spend on a video card.

The SuperClocked version from EVGA was up to 6% faster than the standard GeForce GTX 660 Ti. Although the performance difference seems small, the price difference between the two models is only 3.33%, making it a savvy investment if you want to spend an additional USD 10 to get slightly higher performance.