Compressible Data Test
Contents
As you will have gathered from the previous page, we measured the performance of each drive using CrystalDiskMark.
First, we set CrystalDiskMark to “All 0x00 Fill mode” to evaluate the performance of the SSD when dealing with compressible data.
On the sequential read benchmark, the Intel 600p was 25% faster than the Kingston A400.
On the sequential write benchmark, the Intel 600p was 34% slower than the Kingston A400.
On the random read test with 512 kiB blocks, the Intel 600p was 15% faster than the Kingston A400.
On the random write test with 512 kiB blocks, the Intel 600p was 39% slower than the Kingston A400.
On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the Intel 600p was 77% slower than the Kingston A400.
On the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the Intel 600p was 31% faster than the Kingston A400.
On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the Intel 600p was 63% slower than the Kingston A400.
On the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the Intel 600p was 15% slower than the Kingston A400.
