Incompressible Data Test
Contents
For this test, we set CrystalDiskMark to the default mode, which uses incompressible data.
On the sequential read benchmark, the Intel 600p was 38% faster than the Kingston A400.
On the sequential write benchmark, the Intel 600p was 28% slower than the Kingston A400.
On the random read test with 512 kiB blocks, the Intel 600p was 70% faster than the Kingston A400.
On the random write benchmark with 512 kiB blocks, the Intel 600p was 32% slower than the Kingston A400
On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the Intel 600p was 18% slower than the Kingston A400.
And on the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the Intel 600p was 59% faster than the Kingston A400.
On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the Intel 600p was 57% slower than the Kingston A400.
On the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and queue depth of 32, the Intel 600p was 8% slower than the Kingston A400.
