Load Tests
Contents
We conducted several tests with this power supply, as described in the article, “Hardware Secrets Power Supply Test Methodology.”
First we tested this power supply with five different load patterns, trying to pull around 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% of its labeled maximum capacity (actual percentage used listed under “% Max Load”), watching the behavior of the reviewed unit under each load. In the table below, we list the load patterns we used and the results for each load.
If you add all the powers listed for each test, you may find a different value than what is posted under “Total” below. Since each output can have a slight variation (e.g., the +5 V output working at +5.10 V), the actual total amount of power being delivered is slightly different than the calculated value. In the “Total” row, we are using the real amount of power being delivered, as measured by our load tester.
The +12VA and +12VB inputs listed below are the two +12 V independent inputs from our load tester. During this test, both inputs were connected to the power supply’s single +12 V rail. (The power supply’s EPS12V connector was installed on the +12VB input of the load tester.)
Input | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Test 4 | Test 5 |
+12VA | 5 A (60 W) | 10 A (120 W) | 14.5 A (174 W) | 19 A (228 W) | 24.5 A (294 W) |
+12VB | 5 A (60 W) | 10 A (120 W) | 14 A (168 W) | 19 A (228 W) | 24 A (288 W) |
+5 V | 1 A (5 W) | 2 A (10 W) | 4 A (20 W) | 6 A (30 W) | 8 A (40 W) |
+3.3 V | 1 A (3.3 W) | 2 A (6.6 W) | 4 A (13.2 W) | 6 A (19.8 W) | 8 A (26.4 W) |
+5VSB | 1 A (5 W) | 1.5 A (7.5 W) | 2 A (10 W) | 2.5 A (12.5 W) | 3 A (15 W) |
-12 V | 0.5 A (6 W) | 0.5 A (6 W) | 0.5 A (6 W) | 0.5 A (6 W) | 0.5 A (6 W) |
Total | 137.8 W | 266.5 W | 385.3 W | 519.4 W | 652.4 W |
% Max Load | 21.2% | 41.0% | 59.3% | 79.9% | 100.4% |
Room Temp. | 45.0° C | 44.5° C | 45.7° C | 48.5° C | 47.7° C |
PSU Temp. | 48.0° C | 48.2° C | 49.1° C | 51.5° C | 51.6° C |
Voltage Regulation | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Failed on +3.3 V |
Ripple and Noise | Pass | Pass | Failed on +3.3 V | Failed on +5 V and +3.3 V | Failed on +5 V and +3.3 V |
AC Power | 159.5 W | 305.5 W | 447.9 W | 609.1 W | 798.0 W |
Efficiency | 86.4% | 87.2% | 86.0% | 85.3% | 81.8% |
AC Voltage | 117.1 V | 116.4 V | 114.6 V | 112.7 V | 110.6 V |
Power Factor | 0.981 | 0.985 | 0.991 | 0.994 | 0.996 |
Final Result | Pass | Pass | Failed | Failed | Failed |
Unfortunately, the NZXT HALE82 N 650 W failed our tests. It has a design flaw that we will explore in more detail on the next page.
Efficiency was between 81.8% and 87.2%, virtually matching the 80 Plus Bronze certification, which promises a minimum efficiency of 82% at light (i.e., 20%) and full loads, and 85% at typical (i.e., 50%) load.
Voltages were closer to their nominal values most of the time (i.e., 3% regulation), except the -12 V output during tests one and two, the +5VSB output during test five, and the +3.3 V output during tests four and five. Unfortunately, the +3.3 V output was below the minimum allowed during test five. The ATX12V specification states that positive voltages must be within 5% of their nominal values, and negative voltages must be within 10% of their nominal values. You can see the results in the table below. We marked in red the value that was outside the proper range.
Input | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Test 4 | Test 5 |
+12VA | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% |
+12VB | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% |
+5 V | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% |
+3.3 V | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | +3.18 V | +3.06 V |
+5VSB | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | +4.81 V |
-12 V | -11.46 V | -11.57 V | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% | ≤ 3% |
Let’s discuss the ripple and noise levels on the next page.
Leave a Reply