• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Hardware Secrets

Hardware Secrets

Uncomplicating the complicated

  • Case
  • Cooling
  • Memory
  • Mobile
    • Laptops
    • Smartphones
    • Tablets
  • Motherboard
  • Networking
  • Other
    • Audio
    • Cameras
    • Consumer Electronics
    • Desktops
    • Museum
    • Software
    • Tradeshows & Events
  • Peripherals
    • Headset
    • Keyboard
    • Mouse
    • Printers
  • Power
  • Storage
Home » Thermal Compound Roundup – June 2011

Thermal Compound Roundup – June 2011

[nextpage title=”Introduction”]

Following up on our Thermal Compound Roundup – May 2011 review, we are adding five more thermal compounds to our roundup, for a total of 25 different models from Antec, Arctic Cooling, Arctic Silver, Biostar, Cooler Master, Coolink, Deepcool, Evercool, Gelid, Noctua, Prolimatech, Scythe, Shi-Etsu, Spire, Rosewill, Thermalright, Thermaltake, Titan, Tuniq, Xigmatek, and Zalman. In this review we will determine if certain products are superior to others. We will also try an "alternative" thermal compound to see if it works.

For a better understanding of how the thermal compound (a.k.a. thermal grease or thermal paste) works and how to correctly apply it, please read our How to Correctly Apply Thermal Grease tutorial. The most important concept that you must understand is that it is a mistake to think that the more thermal grease you apply, the better. The thermal compound is a worse heat conductor than copper and aluminum (the metals usually found on cooler bases). So, if you apply more thermal compound than necessary, it will actually lower the cooling performance instead of improving it.

In Figures 1 and 2, there are the five new thermal compounds we are adding to our roundup.

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 1: The new thermal compounds included in this roundup

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 2: The new thermal compounds included in this roundup

Let’s get a closer look at the new contenders in the next pages.

[nextpage title=”The Thermal Compounds”]

We will now examine the five new thermal compounds we are including in our roundup.

Figures 3 reveals the Shi-Etsu MicroSi gray compound, which was requested by our readers.

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 3: Shin-Etsu MicroSi

Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the Titan Connoisseur Platinum Grease gray compound.

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 4: Titan Connoisseur Platinum Grease

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 5: Titan Connoisseur Platinum Grease

Figures 6 and 7 show the Schythe Thermal Elixer Scyte-1000 thermal compound, which also has a gray color.

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 6: Scythe Thermal Elixer Scyte-1000

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 7: Scythe Thermal Elixer Scyte-1000

[nextpage title=”The Thermal Compounds (Cont’d)”]

We also tested the Evercool Cruise Missile STC-03 thermal compound, shown in Figures 8 and 9. It is also gray.

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 8: Evercool Cruise Missile STC-03

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 9: Evercool Cruise Missile STC-03

Figures 10 and 11 display the Rosewill RCX-TC001 thermal compound. Its color is light gray (almost white, actually).

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 10: Rosewill RCX-TC001 thermal compound

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 11: Rosewill RCX-TC001 thermal compound

Figure 12 portrays our CPU with pink lipstick applied on it. We thought, "It is greasy and easy to apply, so it may work as a thermal interface. If it doesn’t, at least our CPU will be fashionable."

Thermal Compound RoundupFigure 12: Pink lipstick

For a detailed look at the other thermal compounds included in this roundup, please check our Thermal Compound Roundup – May 2011 review.

[nextpage title=”How We Tested”]

We tested the thermal compounds using the same testbed system that we currently use to test CPU coolers, which is fully described below. Our Core i7-860 (quad-core, 2.8 GHz) CPU, which is a socket LGA1156 processor with a 95 W TDP (Thermal Design Power), was overclocked to 3.3 GHz (150 MHz base clock and 22x multiplier), and we kept the standard core voltage (Vcore). We used a Zalman CNPS9900 MAX CPU cooler. The only different part in each test was the thermal compound itself.

We measured temperature with the CPU under full load. In order to get 100% CPU usage in all threads, we ran Prime 95 25.11 (in this version, the software uses all available threads) with the "In-place Large FFTs" option. For each test, we applyied the same quantity of thermal compound (about the size of a grain of rice) at
the center of the CPU, as shown in Figure 10.

Thermal CompoundsFigure 13: Applying thermal compound

After each test, we checked the base of the cooler, making sure the quantity of thermal compound was optimal. The thermal compound must be spread evenly on the metallic part of the CPU, without exceeding it, creating a thin layer. The "fingerprint" shown in Figure 11 illustrates that the compound was properly applied.

Thermal CompoundsFigure 14: CPU "fingerprint," showing the thermal compound was correctly applied

Room temperature measurements were taken with a digital thermometer. The core temperature was read with the SpeedFan program (available from the CPU thermal sensors), using an arithmetic average of the core temperature readings. During the tests, the left panel of the case was open.

We also tested the system with no thermal compound on the CPU.

Hardware Configuration

  • Processor: Core i7-860
  • CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900 MAX
  • Motherboard: Gigabyte P55A-UD6
  • Memory: 2 GB Markvision (DDR3-1333/PC3-10700 with 9-9-9-22 timings), configured at 1,200 MHz
  • Hard disk: Seagate Barracuda XT 2 TB
  • Video card: Point of View GeForce GTX 460
  • Power supply: Seventeam ST-550P-AM
  • Case: 3RSystem L-1100 T.REX Cool

Operating System Configuration

  • Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit

Software Used

  • Prime95
  • SpeedFan

Error Margin

Since both room temperature and core temperature readings have 1 °C resolution, we adopted a 2 °C error margin, meaning temperature differences below 2 °C are considered irrelevant.

[nextpage title=”Our Tests”]

The table below presents the results of our measurements.

Thermal Compound Room Temp. Core Temp. Difference
No Thermal Compound 26 °C 88 °C 62 °C
Zalman ZM-STG2 24 °C 59 °C 35 °C
Prolimatech Thermal Compound 24 °C 56 °C 32 °C
Cooler Master Thermal Compound Kit 23 °C 58 °C 35 °C
Evercool EC420-TU15 22 °C 57 °C 35 °C
Spire Bluefrost 22 °C 58 °C 36 °C
Gelid GC Extreme 26 °C 61 °C 35 °C
Coolink Chillaramic 26 °C 61 °C 35 °C
Deepcool Z9 26 °C 61 °C 35 °C
Noctua NT-H1 26 °C 61 °C 35 °C
Thermalright The Chill Factor 26 °C 63 °C 37 °C
Antec Thermal Grease 24 °C 58 °C 34 °C
Arctic Silver 5 24 °C 57 °C 33 °C
Arctic Silver Céramique 24 °C 57 °C 33 °C
Biostar Nano Diamond 22 °C 57 °C 35 °C
Xigmatek PTI-G3606 22 °C 55 °C 33 °C
Antec Formula 7 21 °C 55 °C 34 °C
Arctic Cooling MX-4 21 °C 56 °C 35 °C
Cooler Master High Performance 22 °C 56 °C 34 °C
Thermaltake Thermal Compound 21 °C 54 °C 33 °C
Tuniq TX-3 22 °C 54 °C 32 °C
Shin-Etsu MicroSi 14 °C 49 °C 35 °C
Scythe Thermal Elixer Scyte-1000 14 °C 49 °C 35 °C
Titan Connoisseur Platinum Grease 14 °C 49 °C 35 °C
Evercool Cruise Missile STC-03 14 °C 49 °C 35 °C
Rosewill RCX-TC001 14 °C 53 °C 39 °C
Pink Lipstick 14 °C 54 °C 40 °C

In the following graph, at full load you can see how many degrees Celsius hotter the CPU core is than the air outside the case. The lower this difference, the better is the performance of the thermal compound. The red bars refer to the compounds included in the last batch.

Thermal Compound Roundup

[nextpage title=”Conclusions”]

The results of our tests are still consistent with the data and the conclusions we made so far: On a system like the one we used to compare the thermal compounds, the model and brand make little difference in the CPU temperature.

Now we have nice new information: If you need to mount a CPU cooler and you find yourself out of thermal compound, you can use your mom’s, wife’s, girlfriend’s or daughter’s lipstick. For how long it will work, we cannot say, but it will do the job in an emergency situation.

Next month we will test more thermal compounds and another “alternative” thermal interface material. What will it be? We’re taking suggestions.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

As a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, this site may earn from qualifying purchases. We may also earn commissions on purchases from other retail websites.

car service

Why Is Fleet Maintenance Important?

If you have a fleet of vehicles you use within your business, it’s crucial you keep up with their

Playing Fifa on Play station 4

Tips for Recycling Your Gaming Consoles and Devices

These days, it seems like almost everybody is gaming. As great as this is, it’s also creating a

Business planning

How to Develop Your Venture Capital Business

Venture Capital (VC) is a type of private equity investment in which investors provide funding to

Footer

For Performance

  • PCI Express 3.0 vs. 2.0: Is There a Gaming Performance Gain?
  • Does dual-channel memory make difference on integrated video performance?
  • Overclocking Pros and Cons
  • All Core i7 Models
  • Understanding RAM Timings

Everything you need to know

  • Everything You Need to Know About the Dual-, Triple-, and Quad-Channel Memory Architectures
  • What You Should Know About the SPDIF Connection (2022 Guide)
  • Everything You Need to Know About the Intel Virtualization Technology
  • Everything You Need to Know About the CPU Power Management

Copyright © 2023 · All rights reserved - Hardwaresecrets.com
About Us · Privacy Policy · Contact