XFX Overclocked GeForce 6600 256 MB (PV-T43P-UDS7) Review

Doom 3

Doom 3 is one of the heaviest games available today. As we’ve done on other programs, we ran this game at three resolutions: 1024x768x32, 1280x1024x32 and 1600x1200x32. This game allows several image quality levels and we’ve done our benchmarking on two levels, low and high. We ran demo1 four times and wrote the obtained number of frames per second. The first result we discarded at once, since it is far inferior than the other results. This happens because at the first time we run the demo the game must load all textures to video memory, fact that doesn’t happen from the second time we run the demo on. From the three results left, we consider as our official result the middle result, i.e., we discard the highest and the lowest values. Curiously almost all times the values obtained at the second round on were the same.

A very important detail that we must mention is that Doom 3 has an internal FPS lock: it is only capable of generating 60 frames per second, even if your board is able to produce more frames per second than that. This is done in order to make the game to have the same “playability” sensation independently from the video card installed on the PC. This lock, however, is disabled in the game benchmarking mode.

For further details on how to measure 3D performance with Doom 3, read our tutorial on this subject.

At a resolution of 1024×768 without any image quality enhancement, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 3.78% faster than HIS Radeon X1600 XT, 23.38% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 26.80% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 122.01% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 172.22% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro. Keep in mind that XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB was running at 400 MHz (core) and 800 MHz (memory), while its rival, Albatron GeForce 6600, was running at 300 MHz (core) and 500 MHz (memory).

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to HIS Radeon X800 GT and ATI Radeon X1600 XT.

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 40.96% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 39.80% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 37.76% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 37.17% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 37.17% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 33.24% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 23.18% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 20.55% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 12.39% faster and XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 10.64% faster.

At a resolution of 1280×1024 without any image quality enhancement, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) which was 7.48% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 12.53% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 13.54% faster than HIS Radeon X1600 XT, 34.85% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 37.43% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 156.63% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 214.38% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro,

 XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 86.68% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 81.71% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 79.72% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 73.96% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 60.64% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 54.08% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 52.29% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 50.70% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 19.09% faster, and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 9.54% faster than the board being reviewed.

At a resolution of 1600×1200 without any image quality enhancement, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 16.09% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 16.83% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 17.57% faster than HIS Radeon X1600 XT, 38.87% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 44.31% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 180.92% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 247.17% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 135.33% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 119.57% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 110.60% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 107.07% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 75.00% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 72.28% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 71.47% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 69.57% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 24.73% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 5.71% faster.

At a resolution of 1024×768 enabling image quality enhancements, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 7.21% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 8.28% faster than HIS Radeon X1600 XT, 29.76% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 34.29% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 135.25% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 185.59% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to HIS Radeon X800 GT.

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 45.72% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 44.34% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 43.12% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 40.98% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 40.37% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 35.78% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 27.83% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 24.92% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 12.84% faster and XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 8.26% faster.

At a resolution of 1280×1024 enabling image quality enhancements, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 7.21% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 14.15% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 15.53% faster than HIS Radeon X1600 XT, 38.37% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 42.51% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 158.70% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 217.33% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro,

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 99.16% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 89.50% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 86.34% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 82.14% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 64.29% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 56.30% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 55.25% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 52.10% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 16.60% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 10.50% faster.

At a resolution of 1600×1200 enabling image quality enhancements, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 15.74% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 16.12% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 17.67% faster than HIS Radeon X1600 XT, 41.20% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 46.47% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 204.31% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 242.72% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 150.42% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 126.35% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 114.73% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 113.03% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 73.94% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 73.09% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 71.67% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 70.82% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 22.95% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 6.80% faster.