Palit GeForce 9800 GT 1 GB Video Card Review

3DMark Vantage Professional

3DMark Vantage is the latest addition to the 3DMark series, measuring Shader 4.0 (i.e., DirectX 10) performance and supporting PhysX, a programming interface developed by Ageia (now part of NVIDIA) to transfer physics calculations from the system CPU to the video card GPU in order to increase performance. Mechanical physics is the basis for calculations about the interaction of objects. For example, if you shoot, what exactly will happen to the object when the bullet hits it? Will it break? Will it move? Will the bullet bounce back? Notice that we didn’t upgrade the PhysX to the latest version, which would make the physics calculations for CPU Test 2 to be made by the GPU instead of the CPU on NVIDIA video cards (since we aren’t considering CPU or 3DMark scores this change wouldn’t produce any increase in our results anyway).

We ran this program at three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, and 2560×1600. First we used the “Performance” profile, and then we used the “Extreme” profile (basically enabling anti-aliasing at 4x, anisotropic filtering at 16x, and putting all detail settings at their maximum or “extreme” value. The combination of 2560×1600 resolution with extreme settings didn’t produce reliable results according to the program, so we aren’t going to add them here. The results being compared are the “GPU Scores” achieved by each video card.

Palit GeForce 9800 GT 1 GB
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 7695 108.48%
GeForce 9800 GX2 6990 89.38%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 6193 67.79%
GeForce GTX 260 5898 59.79%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 5651 53.10%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 4797 29.96%
GeForce 8800 GT 3831 3.79%
GeForce 9800 GTX 3805 3.09%
GeForce 9800 GT 3691  
Radeon HD 3870 2977 23.98%
GeForce 8800 GTS 2950 25.12%
Palit GeForce 9800 GT 1 GB
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 6106 106.91%
GeForce 9800 GX2 5379 82.28%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 4880 65.37%
GeForce GTX 260 4582 55.27%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 4336 46.93%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 3725 26.23%
GeForce 8800 GT 2978 0.91%
GeForce 9800 GT 2951  
GeForce 9800 GTX 2891 2.08%
GeForce 8800 GTS 2280 29.43%
Radeon HD 3870 2269 30.06%
Palit GeForce 9800 GT 1 GB
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 2560×1600 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 3549 116.67%
GeForce 9800 GX2 2910 77.66%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 2728 66.54%
GeForce GTX 260 2640 61.17%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2382 45.42%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 2050 25.15%
GeForce 9800 GT 1638  
GeForce 8800 GT 1634 0.24%
GeForce 9800 GTX 1557 5.20%
Radeon HD 3870 1244 31.67%
Palit GeForce 9800 GT 1 GB
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Extreme Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 6005 119.08%
GeForce 9800 GX2 4858 77.23%
GeForce GTX 260 4531 65.30%
Sap
phire Radeon HD 4870
4360 59.07%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 3567 30.13%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 3445 25.68%
GeForce 9800 GT 2741  
GeForce 8800 GT 2733 0.29%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2703 1.41%
Radeon HD 3870 1855 47.76%
GeForce 8800 GTS 997 174.92%
Palit GeForce 9800 GT 1 GB
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Extreme Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 4732 121.54%
GeForce GTX 260 3576 67.42%
GeForce 9800 GX2 3508 64.23%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 3490 63.39%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 2753 28.89%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2669 24.95%
GeForce 9800 GT 2136  
GeForce 8800 GT 2094 2.01%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2038 4.81%
Radeon HD 3870 1439 48.44%

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *