Sapphire HD 4870 Video Card Review

3DMark Vantage Professional

3DMark Vantage is the latest addition to the 3DMark series, measuring Shader 4.0 (i.e., DirectX 10) performance and supporting PhysX, a programming interface developed by Ageia (now part of NVIDIA) to transfer physics calculations from the system CPU to the video card GPU in order to increase performance. Mechanical physics is the basis for calculations about the interaction of objects. For example, if you shoot, what exactly will happen to the object when the bullet hits it? Will it break? Will it move? Will the bullet bounce back? Notice that we didn’t upgrade the PhysX to the latest version, which would make the physics calculations for CPU Test 2 to be made by the GPU instead of the CPU on NVIDIA video cards (since we aren’t considering CPU or 3DMark scores this change wouldn’t produce any increase in our results anyway).

We ran this program at three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, and 2560×1600. First we used the “Performance” profile, and then we used the “Extreme” profile (basically enabling anti-aliasing at 4x, anisotropic filtering at 16x, and putting all detail settings at their maximum or “extreme” value. The combination of 2560×1600 resolution with extreme settings didn’t produce reliable results according to the program, so we aren’t going to add them here. The results being compared are the “GPU Scores” achieved by each video card.

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 7695 24.25%
GeForce 9800 GX2 6990 12.87%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 6808 9.93%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 6193  
GeForce GTX 260 5898 5.00%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 5651 9.59%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 4797 29.10%
GeForce 9800 GTX 3805 62.76%
Radeon HD 3870 2977 108.03%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 6106 25.12%
GeForce 9800 GX2 5379 10.23%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 5315 8.91%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 4880  
GeForce GTX 260 4582 6.50%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 4336 12.55%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 3725 31.01%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2891 68.80%
Radeon HD 3870 2269 115.07%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 2560×1600 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 3549 30.10%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 3068 12.46%
GeForce 9800 GX2 2910 6.67%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 2728  
GeForce GTX 260 2640 3.33%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2382 14.53%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 2050 33.07%
GeForce 9800 GTX 1557 75.21%
Radeon HD 3870 1244 119.29%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Extreme Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 6005 37.73%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 5319 22.00%
GeForce 9800 GX2 4858 11.42%
GeForce GTX 260 4531 3.92%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 4360  
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 3567 22.23%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 3445 26.56%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2703 61.30%
Radeon HD 3870 1855 135.04%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Extreme Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 4732 35.59%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 4188 20.00%
GeForce GTX 260 3576 2.46%
GeForce 9800 GX2 3508 0.52%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 3490  
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 2753 26.77%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2669 30.76%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2038 71.25%
Radeon HD 3870 1439 142.53%

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *