PowerColor Radeon X1950 Pro Extreme with Arctic Cooling System Review

3DMark03

3DMark03 simulates DirectX 8 and 9 games. Even though this program may be considered “old”, we ran it to see how the tested video cards perform on older games. Since we are comparing high-end cards, we ran this program in higher resolutions, as performance difference between high-end video cards is more expressive on such resolutions. We chose three resolutions, 1600×1200, 1920×1440 and 2048×1536. At each resolution we simulated two scenarios, first with no image quality enhancements enabled (this scenario we called “low”) and then with anti-aliasing set at 4x and anisotropic filtering set at 16x (this scenario we called “high”). The results you check below. All video cards listed below were running with the default clock rates defined by the chip manufacturer.

 PowerColor Radeon X1950 Pro Extreme With Arctic Cooling System

3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 1600×1200 Score Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX) 22565 100.70%
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI) 15392 36.90%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis) 14387 27.96%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX) 12020 6.91%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX) 11744 4.46%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor) 11243  
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA) 10278 9.39%

 PowerColor Radeon X1950 Pro Extreme With Arctic Cooling System

3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 1920×1440 Score Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX) 18351 110.18%
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI) 12081 38.37%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis) 11287 29.27%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX) 9437 8.09%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX) 9245 5.89%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor) 8731  
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA) 8018 8.89%

 PowerColor Radeon X1950 Pro Extreme With Arctic Cooling System

3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 2048×1536 Score Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX) 16953 121.43%
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI) 11327 47.95%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis) 10348 35.16%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX) 8386 9.54%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor) 7656  
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA) 7272 5.28%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX) 7066 8.35%

 PowerColor Radeon X1950 Pro Extreme With Arctic Cooling System

3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 1600×1200 AAx4, AFx16 Score Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX) 13181 111.37%
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI) 8637 38.50%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis) 7903 26.73%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX) 6634 6.38%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX) 6422 2.98%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor) 6236  
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA) 5553 12.30%

 PowerColor Radeon X1950 Pro Extreme With Arctic Cooling System

3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 1920×1440 AAx4, AFx16 Score Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX) 10231 114.71%
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI) 6535 37.15%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis) 6037 26.69%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor) 4765  
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX) 4637 2.76%
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX) 4467 6.67%
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA) 3850 23.77%

PowerColor Radeon X1950 Pro Extreme with Arctic Cooling System Review

3DMark03 Professional Edition 3.6.0 – 2048×1536 AAx4, AFx16 Score Difference
GeForce 7950 GX2 (XFX) 9235 125.74%
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB (MSI) 5494 34.29%
GeForce 7950 GT (Zogis) 5409 32.22%
GeForce 7900 GT (XFX) 4187 2.35%
Radeon X1950 Pro (PowerColor) 4091  
GeForce 7800 GTX (XFX) 4030 1.51%
GeForce 7800 GT (NVIDIA) 3470 17.90%

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *