Far Cry is a heavy game based on the Shader 3.0 (DirectX 9.0c) programming model. We’ve updated the game to version 1.4. To measure the performance we run four times the demo created by German magazine PC Games Hardware (PCGH) and the results presented below are an arithmetic average of the collected data. We used the HardwareOC Far Cry Benchmark 1.7 utility to help us collecting data.
Since we are comparing high-end cards, we ran this game in higher resolutions, as performance difference between high-end video cards is more expressive on such resolutions. We chose three resolutions, 1600×1200, 1920×1440 and 2048×1536. At each resolution we simulated two scenarios, first with no image quality enhancements enabled and graphics details set to “maximum” (this scenario we called “low”) and then with anti-aliasing set at 8x, anisotropic filtering set at 16x and graphics details set to “ultra” (this scenario we called “high”). On all scenarios we set the rendering engine to Shader 3.0. The results, given in frames per second, you check below. All video cards listed below were running with the default clock rates defined by the chip manufacturer.
Let’s take a look at the latest full-tower case from Thermaltake, the Overseer RX-I, which has eight expansion slots and comes with an external 3.5”/2.5” docking bay.
Let’s take a look at the latest mid-tower case from the Dutch manufacturer Nexus, which features a 3.5”/2.5” docking station, eight expansion slots, and is targeted to silent computing.
We tested this new mouse with a 4,000 dpi optical sensor and the same Easy-Shift[+] technology from the Kone[+] model, also from Roccat. See how it fared on our analysis.