Sapphire Atomic HD 3870 X2 Video Card Review

3DMark06 Professional

3DMark06 measures Shader 3.0 (i.e., DirectX 9.0c) performance. We run this software under three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, and 2560×1600, first with no image quality enhancements enabled – results we call “low” on the charts and tables below –, then setting 4x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering. See the results below.

GeForce GTX 280

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 – 1680×1050 – Low Score Difference
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 16260  
GeForce 9800 GX2 15623 4.08%
GeForce GTX 280 14904 9.10%
GeForce 9800 GTX 12759 27.44%
Radeon HD 3870 10694 52.05%

GeForce GTX 280

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 – 1920×1200 – Low Score Difference
GeForce 9800 GX2 15547 0.37%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 15489  
GeForce GTX 280 14215 8.96%
GeForce 9800 GTX 11631 33.17%
Radeon HD 3870 9454 63.84%

GeForce GTX 280

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 – 2560×1600 – Low Score Difference
GeForce 9800 GX2 13015 5.68%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 12315  
GeForce GTX 280 11766 4.67%
GeForce 9800 GTX 8743 40.86%
Radeon HD 3870 6823 80.49%

GeForce GTX 280

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 – 1680×1050 – High Score Difference
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 16260  
GeForce 9800 GX2 13900 16.98%
GeForce GTX 280 12157 33.75%
GeForce 9800 GTX 8981 81.05%
Radeon HD 3870 6915 135.14%

GeForce GTX 280

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 – 1920×1200 – High Score Difference
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 15489  
GeForce 9800 GX2 12213 26.82%
GeForce GTX 280 10991 40.92%
GeForce 9800 GTX 7811 98.30%
Radeon HD 3870 6114 153.34%

GeForce GTX 280

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 – 2560×1600 – High Score Difference
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 12315  
GeForce 9800 GX2 9829 25.29%
GeForce GTX 280 8704 41.49%
GeForce 9800 GTX 5774 113.28%
Radeon HD 3870 4319 185.14%

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *