Zotac GeForce GTX 295 Video Card Review

3DMark Vantage Professional

3DMark Vantage is the latest addition to the 3DMark series, measuring Shader 4.0 (i.e., DirectX 10) performance and supporting PhysX, a programming interface developed by Ageia (now part of NVIDIA) to transfer physics calculations from the system CPU to the video card GPU in order to increase performance. Mechanical physics is the basis for calculations about the interaction of objects. For example, if you shoot, what exactly will happen to the object when the bullet hits it? Will it break? Will it move? Will the bullet bounce back? Notice that we didn’t upgrade the PhysX to the latest version, which would make the physics calculations for CPU Test 2 to be made by the GPU instead of the CPU on NVIDIA video cards (since we aren’t considering CPU or 3DMark scores this change wouldn’t produce any increase in our results anyway).

We ran this program at three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, and 2560×1600. First we used the “Performance” profile, and then we used the “Extreme” profile (basically enabling anti-aliasing at 4x, anisotropic filtering at 16x, and putting all detail settings at their maximum or “extreme” value. The combination of 2560×1600 resolution with extreme settings didn’t produce reliable results according to the program, so we aren’t going to add them here. The results being compared are the “GPU Scores” achieved by each video card.

GeForce GTX 295
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 295 13992  
Radeon HD 4870 X2 11697 19.62%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 10420 34.28%
GeForce GTX 285 9391 48.99%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 8050 73.81%
GeForce GTX 280 7695 81.83%
GeForce 9800 GX2 6990 100.17%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 6467 116.36%
Radeon HD 4870 6193 125.93%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 5898 137.23%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 5651 147.60%
Radeon HD 4850 4797 191.68%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 4499 211.00%
Radeon HD 4830 4220 231.56%
GeForce 9800 GTX 3805 267.73%
GeForce 9800 GT 3691 279.08%
Radeon HD 3870 2977 370.00%
GeForce GTX 295
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 295 11317  
Radeon HD 4870 X2 9472 19.48%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 8292 36.48%
GeForce GTX 285 7384 53.26%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 6355 78.08%
GeForce GTX 280 6106 85.34%
GeForce 9800 GX2 5379 110.39%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 5084 122.60%
Radeon HD 4870 4880 131.91%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 4582 146.99%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 4336 161.00%
Radeon HD 4850 3725 203.81%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 3370 235.82%
Radeon HD 4830 3301 242.84%
GeForce 9800 GT 2951 283.50%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2891 291.46%
Radeon HD 3870 2269 398.77%
GeForce GTX 295
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 2560×1600 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 295 6474  
Radeon HD 4870 X2 5542 16.82%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 4756 36.12%
GeForce GTX 285 4259 52.01%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 4197 54.25%
GeForce GTX 280 3549 82.42%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 2927 121.18%
GeForce 9800 GX2 2910 122.47%
Radeon HD 4870 2728 137.32%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 2640 145.23%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2382 171.79%
Radeon HD 4850 2050 215.80%
Radeon HD 4830 1837 252.42%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 1815 256.69%
GeForce 9800 GT 1638 295.24%
GeForce 9800 GTX 1557 315.80%
Radeon HD 3870 1244 420.42%
GeForce GTX 295

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Extreme Score Difference
GeForce GTX 295 11091  
Radeon HD 4870 X2 8405 31.96%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 8093 37.04%
GeForce GTX 285 7253 52.92%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 6859 61.70%
GeForce GTX 280 6005 84.70%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 5055 119.41%
GeForce 9800 GX2 4858 128.30%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 4531 144.78%
Radeon HD 4870 4360 154.38%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 3567 210.93%
Radeon HD 4850 3445 221.94%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 3201 246.49%
Radeon HD 4830 2982 271.93%
GeForce 9800 GT 2741 304.63%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2703 310.32%
Radeon HD 3870 1855 497.90%
GeForce GTX 295
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Extreme Score Difference
GeForce GTX 295 8727  
Radeon HD 4870 X2 6916 26.19%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 6420 35.93%
GeForce GTX 285 5745 51.91%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 5554 57.13%
GeForce GTX 280 4732 84.43%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 3954 120.71%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 3576 144.04%
GeForce 9800 GX2 3508 148.77%
Radeon HD 4870 3490 150.06%
Radeon HD 4850 2753 217.00%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2669 226.98%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 2399 263.78%
Radeon HD 4830 2349 271.52%
GeForce 9800 GT 2136 308.57%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2038 328.21%
Radeon HD 3870 1439 506.46%

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *