3DMark Vantage is the latest addition to the 3DMark series, measuring Shader 4.0 (i.e., DirectX 10) performance and supporting PhysX, a programming interface developed by Ageia (now part of NVIDIA) to transfer physics calculations from the system CPU to the video card GPU in order to increase performance. Mechanical physics is the basis for calculations about the interaction of objects. For example, if you shoot, what exactly will happen to the object when the bullet hits it? Will it break? Will it move? Will the bullet bounce back? Notice that we didn’t upgrade the PhysX to the latest version, which would make the physics calculations for CPU Test 2 to be made by the GPU instead of the CPU on NVIDIA video cards (since we aren’t considering CPU or 3DMark scores this change wouldn’t produce any increase in our results anyway).
We ran this program at three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, and 2560×1600. First we used the “Performance” profile, and then we used the “Extreme” profile (basically enabling anti-aliasing at 4x, anisotropic filtering at 16x, and putting all detail settings at their maximum or “extreme” value. The combination of 2560×1600 resolution with extreme settings didn’t produce reliable results according to the program, so we aren’t going to add them here. The results being compared are the “GPU Scores” achieved by each video card.
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Performance
Score
Difference
GeForce GTX 295
13992
Radeon HD 4870 X2
11697
19.62%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW
10420
34.28%
GeForce GTX 285
9391
48.99%
Radeon HD 4850 X2
8050
73.81%
GeForce GTX 280
7695
81.83%
GeForce 9800 GX2
6990
100.17%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.)
6467
116.36%
Radeon HD 4870
6193
125.93%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.)
5898
137.23%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2
5651
147.60%
Radeon HD 4850
4797
191.68%
GeForce 9800 GTX+
4499
211.00%
Radeon HD 4830
4220
231.56%
GeForce 9800 GTX
3805
267.73%
GeForce 9800 GT
3691
279.08%
Radeon HD 3870
2977
370.00%
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Performance
Score
Difference
GeForce GTX 295
11317
Radeon HD 4870 X2
9472
19.48%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW
8292
36.48%
GeForce GTX 285
7384
53.26%
Radeon HD 4850 X2
6355
78.08%
GeForce GTX 280
6106
85.34%
GeForce 9800 GX2
5379
110.39%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.)
5084
122.60%
Radeon HD 4870
4880
131.91%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.)
4582
146.99%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2
4336
161.00%
Radeon HD 4850
3725
203.81%
GeForce 9800 GTX+
3370
235.82%
Radeon HD 4830
3301
242.84%
GeForce 9800 GT
2951
283.50%
GeForce 9800 GTX
2891
291.46%
Radeon HD 3870
2269
398.77%
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 2560×1600 – Performance
Score
Difference
GeForce GTX 295
6474
Radeon HD 4870 X2
5542
16.82%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW
4756
36.12%
GeForce GTX 285
4259
52.01%
Radeon HD 4850 X2
4197
54.25%
GeForce GTX 280
3549
82.42%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.)
2927
121.18%
GeForce 9800 GX2
2910
122.47%
Radeon HD 4870
2728
137.32%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.)
2640
145.23%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2
2382
171.79%
Radeon HD 4850
2050
215.80%
Radeon HD 4830
1837
252.42%
GeForce 9800 GTX+
1815
256.69%
GeForce 9800 GT
1638
295.24%
GeForce 9800 GTX
1557
315.80%
Radeon HD 3870
1244
420.42%
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Extreme
Score
Difference
GeForce GTX 295
11091
Radeon HD 4870 X2
8405
31.96%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW
8093
37.04%
GeForce GTX 285
7253
52.92%
Radeon HD 4850 X2
6859
61.70%
GeForce GTX 280
6005
84.70%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.)
5055
119.41%
GeForce 9800 GX2
4858
128.30%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.)
4531
144.78%
Radeon HD 4870
4360
154.38%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2
3567
210.93%
Radeon HD 4850
3445
221.94%
GeForce 9800 GTX+
3201
246.49%
Radeon HD 4830
2982
271.93%
GeForce 9800 GT
2741
304.63%
GeForce 9800 GTX
2703
310.32%
Radeon HD 3870
1855
497.90%
3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Extreme
Today we dissected Strider ST50F, a 500 W power supply from Silverstone. Is this a good product? Can it really deliver its labeled 500 W? Check it out.