Zotac GeForce GTX 295 Video Card Review

Crysis

Crysis is a very heavy DirectX 10 game. We updated this game to version 1.2.1 and used the HOC Crysis Benchmarking Utility to help us collecting data. Since we don’t think the default demo based on the island map stresses the video card the way we want, we used the HOC core demo available with the abovementioned utility. We ran this demo under three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, and 2560×1600, first with image quality set to “low” and then with image quality set to “high.” Since all video cards achieved a number of frames per second below 10 at 2560×1600 with image details set to “high,” we are not including this test as the results aren’t reliable. We ran each test twice and discarded the first result, as usually the first run achieves a lower score compared to the subsequent runs since the game loses time loading files. The results below are the average number of frames per second (FPS) achieved by each card.

GeForce GTX 295
Crysis 1.2.1 – 1680×1050 – Low Score Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 134 20.72%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 125 12.61%
GeForce GTX 280 125 12.61%
GeForce GTX 285 124 11.71%
Radeon HD 4870 X2 120 8.11%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 115 3.60%
GeForce GTX 295 111  
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 107 3.74%
Radeon HD 4870 101 9.90%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 99 12.12%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 91 21.98%
GeForce 9800 GTX 84 32.14%
Radeon HD 4850 84 32.14%
GeForce 9800 GX2 75 48.00%
GeForce 9800 GT 75 48.00%
Radeon HD 4830 74 50.00%
Radeon HD 3870 71 56.34%
GeForce GTX 295
Crysis 1.2.1 – 1920×1200 – Low Score Difference
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 122 28.42%
Radeon HD 4870 X2 119 25.26%
GeForce GTX 280 115 21.05%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 115 21.05%
GeForce GTX 285 113 18.95%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 108 13.68%
GeForce GTX 295 95  
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 91 4.40%
Radeon HD 4870 84 13.10%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 83 14.46%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 76 25.00%
GeForce 9800 GTX 69 37.68%
Radeon HD 4850 67 41.79%
GeForce 9800 GX2 63 50.79%
GeForce 9800 GT 61 55.74%
Radeon HD 4830 61 55.74%
Radeon HD 3870 58 63.79%
GeForce GTX 295
Crysis 1.2.1 – 2560×1600 – Low Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 103 60.94%
GeForce GTX 280 95 48.44%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 86 34.38%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 85 32.81%
GeForce GTX 285 77 20.31%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 71 10.94%
GeForce GTX 295 64  
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 60 6.67%
Radeon HD 4870 53 20.75%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 52 23.08%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 49 30.61%
GeForce 9800 GTX 44 45.45%
Radeon HD 4850 43 48.84%
GeForce 9800 GX2 42 52.38%
GeForce 9800 GT 39 64.10%
Radeon HD 4830 38 68.42%
Radeon HD 3870 35 82.86%
GeForce GTX 295
Crysis 1.2.1 – 1680×1050 – High Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 57 39.02%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 55 34.15%
GeForce GTX 285 50 21.95%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 47 14.63%
GeForce GTX 280 42 2.44%
GeForce GTX 295 41  
Radeon HD 4870 37 10.81%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 37 10.81%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 32 28.13%
GeForce 9800 GTX 29 41.38%
Radeon HD 4850 29 41.38%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 29 41.38%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 26 57.69%
GeForce 9800 GX2 25 64.00%
GeForce 9800 GT 25 64.00%
Radeon HD 4830 25 64.00%
Radeon HD 3870 19 115.79%
GeForce GTX 295
Crysis 1.2.1 – 1920×1200 – High Score Difference
Radeon HD 4870 X2 47 38.24%
EVGA GeForce GTX 285 FTW 45 32.35%
GeForce GTX 285 41 20.59%
Radeon HD 4850 X2 39 14.71%
GeForce GTX 280 34 0.00%
GeForce GTX 295 34  
Radeon HD 4870 30 13.33%
GeForce GTX 260 (216 Proc.) 30 13.33%
GeForce GTX 260 (192 Proc.) 26 30.77%
Radeon HD 4850 23 47.83%
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 23 47.83%
GeForce 9800 GTX 22 54.55%
GeForce 9800 GX2 21 61.90%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 20 70.00%
GeForce 9800 GT 20 70.00%
Radeon HD 4830 20 70.00%
Radeon HD 3870 16 112.50%

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *