XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX Video Card Review

3DMark Vantage Professional

3DMark Vantage is the latest addition to the 3DMark series, measuring Shader 4.0 (i.e., DirectX 10) performance and supporting PhysX, a programming interface developed by Ageia (now part of NVIDIA) to transfer physics calculations from the system CPU to the video card GPU in order to increase performance. Mechanical physics is the basis for calculations about the interaction of objects. For example, if you shoot, wh
at exactly will happen to the object when the bullet hits it? Will it break? Will it move? Will the bullet bounce back? Notice that we didn’t upgrade the PhysX to the latest version, which would make the physics calculations for CPU Test 2 to be made by the GPU instead of the CPU on NVIDIA video cards (since we aren’t considering CPU or 3DMark scores this change wouldn’t produce any increase in our results anyway).

We ran this program at three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, and 2560×1600. First we used the “Performance” profile, and then we used the “Extreme” profile (basically enabling anti-aliasing at 4x, anisotropic filtering at 16x, and putting all detail settings at their maximum or “extreme” value. The combination of 2560×1600 resolution with extreme settings didn’t produce reliable results according to the program, so we aren’t going to add them here. The results being compared are the “GPU Scores” achieved by each video card.

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 7695 13.03%
GeForce 9800 GX2 6990 2.67%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 6808  
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 6193 9.93%
GeForce GTX 260 5898 15.43%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 5651 20.47%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 4797 41.92%
GeForce 9800 GTX 3805 78.92%
Radeon HD 3870 2977 128.69%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 6106 14.88%
GeForce 9800 GX2 5379 1.20%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 5315  
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 4880 8.91%
GeForce GTX 260 4582 16.00%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 4336 22.58%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 3725 42.68%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2891 83.85%
Radeon HD 3870 2269 134.24%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 2560×1600 – Performance Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 3549 15.68%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 3068  
GeForce 9800 GX2 2910 5.43%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 2728 12.46%
GeForce GTX 260 2640 16.21%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2382 28.80%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 2050 49.66%
GeForce 9800 GTX 1557 97.05%
Radeon HD 3870 1244 146.62%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1680×1050 – Extreme Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 6005 12.90%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 5319  
GeForce 9800 GX2 4858 9.49%
GeForce GTX 260 4531 17.39%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 4360 22.00%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 3567 49.12%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 3445 54.40%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2703 96.78%
Radeon HD 3870 1855 186.74%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 – 1920×1200 – Extreme Score Difference
GeForce GTX 280 4732 12.99%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 4188  
GeForce GTX 260 3576 17.11%
GeForce 9800 GX2 3508 19.38%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 3490 20.00%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 2753 52.12%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 2669 56.91%
GeForce 9800 GTX 2038 105.50%
Radeon HD 3870 1439 191.04%

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *